This makes my third post on this still-young blog about dealing with information overload on the web (and yes, I do realize the irony of that statement.) But in this day of countless blogs and news sites, combined with a daily barrage of email and countless social networks to keep up (not to mention micro-information overload from the likes of Twitter and Friendfeed), I think this is an issue many people struggle with. And hey, I just want to help.
So this post is going to show you how to handle the constant barrage of web-prose with poise and grace by using Google Reader as your personal web brain for filtering what you should read and capturing what you may want to reference later on.
There are certainly other ways of accomplishing this goal: Steve Pavlina Rubel [I'm officially an idiot and apologize for that embarrassing name mixup... especially since Rubel stopped by via a search for links to his site and then shared my post on FriendFeed... whoops. Sorry Steve!] at the popular blog Micro Persuasion prefers to use Gmail as his "nerve centre", for example, while Linden over at Linden's Pensieve prefers Diigo for capturing the best of the web, and many of Lifehacker's commenters recently weighed in with different options for bookmarking interesting content online as well.
But Google Reader works really well for me, so while I encourage you to explore those other links, this post is will concentrate on my own 3-step method of finding and filtering the steady flow of information using this powerful service.
Step 1- Get Google Reader
First thing's first, if you want to use Google Reader as your online brain, well, you need to go here and open an account if you don't already have one (dont worry, it's easy.)
If you already have a Gmail account (or any other Google service), all you need to do is sign in. If you don't have Gmail, sign up for a Google Account and you'll be able to use Reader AND also get access to the best online email service as a bonus ("One million reasons why you should be using Gmail" is another post for another day, but I urge you to give it a try too if you haven't already.)
I'm not one to reinvent the wheel, so I won't go into great detail about exactly how Reader works because Abraham over on Piper's blog gives a great step-by-step rundown of what the heck RSS is and how to use Google Reader, complete with screen-shots. [I came across his tutorial linked on SEO Diva's site, which is packed with helpful hints on running marketing your website. See my point in Step 2 about finding good content by reading good bloggers.]
So now that you have set up your Reader and subscribed to a few interesting feeds to get yourself started (including mine, right?), you will now be faced with the dilemma of where to find more piping hot and fresh content that you actually want to read, so you can have it automatically pushed to your new "story inbox" all the time - no more slagging through website after website to find stuff worth reading.
And that brings us to step 2.
Step 2- Find Stuff to Read Worth Reading
One of the main obstacles to overcome when trying to filter the web, especially if you are new to the blogosphere (and even if you're not), is figuring out where to find good, fresh content about topics that interest you.
Well it just so happens that Google Reader can be a great help in this department as well, in a few different ways.
The first thing you should do is check out it's baked-in recommendations tools.
Leveraging Reader's Recommended Blogs and Pre-packaged Blog Bundles
There is a link right in the Reader sidebar called "Discover." When you click on this option, you will be presented with two tabs, one called Recommendations and one called Browse, both of which can be helpful. Let's take a quick look at each of these.
When you're first starting out, the Recommendations tab won't give you anything (yet), because Reader doesn't feel he really knows you well enough to be giving blog recommendations on the first date. He's a gentleman like that. So we'll come back to this one.
Under Browse, on the other hand, you can really dig in right from the get-go and get started by adding some of Reader's so-called Bundles of feeds on topics you find interesting. So go ahead, flip over to Reader and add a few of these to get started- read through them, then come back and we'll continue. I'll wait right here and polish up the next Step a bit while you're gone...
Oh, you're back? Wow, I started to think you might never return. You must have found some really interesting stuff over there. See, what did I tell you?
Well, now that you're back, you're probably wondering how else you can find quality content on the internet using Google Reader. For starters, in case it wasn't obvious from my statement a couple paragraphs ago, the Recommendations tab in Reader can be a great tool for finding new stuff, but only once you've trained it a bit to recognize your tastes. So make sure to check that out in a couple weeks. (You won't be disappointed, I promise.)
Let Other Blog Readers Do The Dirty Work
Another great feature of Reader is its Shared Items function, which I will explore at greater length in Step 3 below. But to explain it most basically, this function allows us readers to click a little Share button at the bottom of posts we like and store them all in a personalized feed of our favourite items.
And thanks to this neat feature, a simple and great way to discover new content can be to skim the Favourites Feeds of people whose tastes you trust. If you trust mine, for example (a risky proposition indeed), you can follow my Google Reader Shared Items here, or take a look at the widget over there on the right-hand side of this blog (scroll down almost all the way) to see my ten most recently shared items.
But what if you don't trust anybody's tastes, and instead just want to know what blog posts the general Reader community are finding popular as a whole? Well if you're really that cynical (I kid), there is good news: you can find that information all in one place, too.
Playing off the notion that the stuff a lot of people favourite is probably pretty good, a website called RSSMeme has created quite a resource, a resource that combines all the most popular items on all Shared Items feeds for all users of Reader, in order to cull out the most popular ones for your reading pleasure. So if you're looking for solid material, this is a great site that leverages Google Reader's built-in functions to create a great content discovery tool - make sure to check it out.
Let Your Blogging Circle Grow Naturally Outwards
Finally, Google Reader can help you find interesting content in a more roundabout way: by encouraging you to read blogs in the first place. Because the best advice I can possibly give for finding quality blogs, based on my own experience, is to find a couple bloggers you like to read (one down, one to go...), and grow your circle outward from there. The best bloggers believe that the web is meant for collaboration and they will gladly link to other posts they find interesting on a regular basis (See Seth Godin's great post about this here.)
That means that by following a few good bloggers, your network of good info sources should grow exponentially in no time just by checking out the links they provide for you on a regular basis. I know my own "content network" has grown immensely in this way.
So now that your Reader is chock full of interesting writing that you just can't wait to bite into every day, how are you supposed to actually remember or act on any of the articles you like, what with so much content to consume. You can't very well memorize the URL of every cool blog post and web site you come across, right?
Well maybe you can't, but the good news is: Reader can.
Step 3 - Using Reader to Capture and Remember the Posts and Sites You Really Like
With that useful little Share button I mentioned earlier (pictured in the screenshot at left), you can file away any blog post from a feed that you subscribe to right in Reader with a simple click. It doesn't get any easier than that - read it, like it, share it.
And with that one action, you've captured the post in your very own Shared feed that is easily Searchable from within Reader. You can keep this feed private, or choose to publish it publicly like I do, so others can see what you've shared, too.
But what about stuff you choose to read on the actual web sites (not within Reader)? Maybe you've subscribed to a feed that only broadcasts partial posts and forces you to click through to read the full thing. Or maybe you've stumbled across a cool video on Youtube, or some other piece of content outside of Reader. How can you capture and file that information as well without having to have two separate online "filing cabinets"? I'm glad you asked, let me tell you how you can now combine the two.
Google Reader Share It Now As The Internet Bookmark of the Future (No, For Real This Time)
Most web users are familiar with the term Internet Bookmarks and I'm sure you are, too. When you find a site you like and want to return to later, just click 'Add Bookmark' and voila, it's saved in that handy drop-down menu in your browser. Nice and easy, right?
Well, the only problem with this traditional method of remembering sites you enjoy is that your bookmarks folder is like the electronic equivalent of a pack-rat's attic: the more stuff you shove into it, the harder it is to find anything useful.
Because of that issue, when the whole Web 2.0 craze began, one of the first types of social services to arise was that of "social bookmarking", formed around the idea that bookmarks are much more useful if they are saved online where you can find them from any computer at any time with a simple search, and share them with other users at the same time.
One of the pioneers in this space was a company called del.icio.us (which you can now reach at the less cryptic delicious.com address too), a no-frills service (now owned by Yahoo) that promised to revolutionize bookmarking by making it extremely simple and useful.
You see, to use delicious, all you have to do is a) learn what a bookmarklet is, b) install it in your browser (well, actually it works better in the Firefox browser, so make that c) download Firefox first, and then install the bookmarklet, then d) go to your favourite site and e) click the bookmarklet.) Next, when a window pops up just f) enter a title, g) a description, and h) some tags, and then i) click save and j) voila, your site has been filed away and will be easily retrieved with k) a simple search, which you can either do from the Delicious homepage, if you happen to be there, or from another Firefox browser extension... which you'll have to l) install first. It's all very simple!
If you're thinking 'That is the most complicated paragraph I have ever read in my life!', you are not alone.
Personally, I did like the idea of having my favourite sites available on the web from any location, and easily sharable, so I did give delicious a spin awhile ago, but I just found the bookmarking process itself so cumbersome (see above) that I dreaded using it (which kind of defeats the purpose.)
Many other services have sprung up that try to improve on the Delicious idea (like Linden's darling Diigo, for example, which I found useful and much better than delicious, but better suited for more in-depth annotation and research), and I might have tried a few other alternatives (there are way too many) to see how they compared as well, except that my perfect online bookmarking service snuck up and bit me from somewhere I didn't expect it to - from right within my beloved Google Reader!
How Google Reader Became My Ultimate Web Brain
As I've explained, Google Reader has, for quite some time, included that button on all their posts that allowed users to add the post to a special feed called My Shared Items. Since I do almost all of my web reading via RSS now, Reader is a permanent fixture on tab two of my browser and so this simple function was almost acting as a pseudo-bookmarking service for me for quite awhile.
But when I wanted to save a page on a blog I didn't subscribe to, or that didn't have a feed, or if I wanted to save something like a Youtube video, for the longest time there was no way to bookmark those types of content using Google Reader, so I had actually reverted to using plain old Firefox bookmarks again for those types of content.
That all changed on May 6 of this year, when Google announced Shared Items With Notes and provided a way to add items to your feed outside of Reader.
While this new feature did involve installing a Bookmarklet (which I realize I just poked fun at mere paragraphs ago), it is as simple as opening your Shared Feed in Reader and dragging a button from the window up onto your Bookmark bar. Presto.
And unlike Delicious, adding new items with this plugin is not a pain - you simply highlight a portion of the page you want to clip (if any), click the Bookmarklet and up pops a slick box that asks if you want to add a note. If you do, add one. If you don't, click save. Done - you've added the page to the same feed that tracks all your favourite posts in Reader!
Even better, it is now fully searchable within the Reader interface, like having your own efficient, personal Google Search Engine just for your bookmarks.
In Sum
I have been using this system for about a month now and it has worked incredibly well for me. I am always finding new great content, reading it with ease and bookmarking the gems. I haven't once gotten lazy and just bookmarked something in Firefox like I used to when delicious was my socialmarking service du jour (unless you count the bookmarking I had to do in order to aggregate all the entries to Copyblogger's Twitlist contest.)
And more importantly, on several occasions, when trying to pull up a page I wanted to re-read or link to on this blog, I just switched over to Google Reader quickly, punched in a search and bam: I had the page in front of me in seconds.
So if you have a photographic memory and can record every useful site or article you read in your own superhuman memory bank for future reference, then this guide probably didn't help you much.
But if, like the rest of us, you could use a little supplementary web brain power, why don't you give this system a try and let us know how you make out in the comments. Think you've got a better process for finding, reading and bookmarking content? Then please enlighten us about that in the comments, too.
By the way, if you found this post useful, it would be great if you would give it a Digg by clicking the button below - this will help others on the 'net to find my article and when they, in turn, also find it useful, they'll Digg it again, and so on and so forth, the circle of life continues. Thanks.
---
I want to apologize for my absence from the blog for the past two days - certain personal circumstances have prevented me from spending any amount of time here, and any time I did spend was on finishing this post. However, the rhythm of posts should be regular again going forward. Thanks for sticking it out.
Also, a big welcome to all the new readers who've come here from links across the web over the past week. I hope to make you laugh, cry, and feel various other emotions on an almost-daily basis.
By the way, as promised, a new contest will be launched here tonight at 7pm EST, based in part on the Copyblogger TwitLit competition that I have blogged about here recently.
What will the competition be about? Well aside from the obvious fact that it will involve Twitter, I will give you another small hint - consider what day it is today... Hope to see you back here tonight!
[Update: The contest is now live here.]
It's funny that I actually wrote two posts recently that point out a few of the issues here that will inevitably pop up as soon as you become a heavy user of either GR or del.icio.us.
The gist is that I constantly have about 2K+ unread feeds and that I don't remember what I bookmarked a year ago.
And as for finding new stuff to read, I use Twitter for that. Information overload circle closed.
But you do make some good points here and did a great job of explaining some of this stuff to newbies. Third post only eh? Well, good luck then. Cheers!
Nils,
Thanks for your comment. I checked out the posting on your blog (via your Twitter profile) and you make a good point. I'm sure I have done the same thing when I used delicious (which I did for over a year.)
But I suppose my opinion is that a web page I like twice saved is better than a web page I like lost forever!
Also, re: the 2k unread feeds, I do periodically have to declare Google Reader bankruptcy and mark all posts read when I get a bit behind, but I still find Reader the best tool for keeping up to date most of the time.
Oh and btw, this wasn't my third post - it was my third post about -this topic-, although I have only been blogging here for a little more than a month.
Thanks for adding your 2 cents - keep up the good work on your blog (to which I have subscribed) and I hope to see you back here soon.
Daniel
Thanks for the link love! Just to clarify, though, I like Diigo for recording the sites I want to find again and annotating the web, but I love Google Reader for managing info overload.
I like your method. I might have to give it a try, now that I know about the Note in Reader bookmarklet. That was always the downfall for me: No way to add sites you couldn't see in Google Reader.
IMHO its not about keeping bookmarks-it's about taking action on them or just ignoring them. see what i mean @ http://terrainnova.org/blog/?p=109 . Also, GR is not that good for finding new stuff - i find twitter better at it too. And of course I too go GR bankrupt often-no harm done really:)
Great post, a lot of good tips for dealing with news and web content, especially for beginners.
My experience with info-overload really stems from the tyranny of read/unread story "inbox". For me it was a real problem once I'd subscribed to a lot of feeds, especially if you add any mainstream news feeds (e.g. CNN) or sites that post many times per day (TechCrunch, Mashable, etc...). Different people react to this differently, but it could be because I may be slightly obsessive compulsive, but seeing the "inbox number" constantly growing, or with numbers in the thousands after going away for a while always made me feel like I was behind, or not spending enough time engaging with the news. The "mark all as read" also somehow made me fell guilty. This was one of the main reasons my partner and I started Grazr.
The solution that's worked best for me is to compartmentalize my feed reading into two distinct reading experiences. The first is stuff I genuinely want to read _every_ post, like my friend's blogs, family blogs, and a few important blogs. I put these into my feed reader (NetNewsWire for me).
The second category includes feeds I find interesting but don't necessarily want to read everything. These are feeds I want to scan and see what's going on right now. I use the "river of news" model for all of these (probably in the hundreds if not thousands of feeds now among all my rivers). The first thing I did when I started doing this was take my whole feed reader reading list and turn it into a river-of-news and it was immediately very liberating. My whole reading experience has changed because of it, I don't feel as "anxious" anymore (again it could be my particular weirdness :) ).
What's interesting is that after I've been using this model for a while the number of feeds I absolutely want to track every post has dwindled to a handful. The scanning of what's happening now makes huge amounts of information pretty easy to digest and things that roll off the bottom I don't worry about.
Grazr was started to help deal with this particular way of dealing with info overload. We have tools to let you easily take reading lists and create these rivers-of-news style reading experiences (grazr calls them streams). Grazr also lets you make multiple streams/rivers of news but that's a pay feature for when you want to have multiple topic based rivers of news.
Anyway, end of my plug, but even if you don't use Grazr, check out using river-of-news style reading for large volumes of feeds, it really is a better model once you get above a certain number of subscriptions.
Oy, that's what I get for posting a comment too late at night/early morning. Started out short and then I got rambling. It barely makes sense :).
My basic point was, check out river of news style feed reading, it really is a useful way to deal with information overload.
Good post. I've been using Reader as my web hub for a few months. Its useful functionality can't be understated.
Hi Daniel. This a wonderfully detailed post. Thanks for sharing. I've spread the word on my blog.
I've been remiss in replying to your comments on this post - sorry about that! I've been surprised and flattered by the attention this article continues to get weeks after being written and I keep forgetting to come back to it. In any case, let me catch up now:
@Linden: Don't mention it! It makes sense that you use Diigo for that type of thing - I've yet to see a better solution for annotative research online. I agree with you that Reader is the King when it comes to content sorting and consuming. The Note In Reader bookmarklet was definitely a game-changer. Give it a try!
Another cool thing about it that I didn't mention in the article is that the bookmarklet can act as a one-stop-shop for adding sites to your Lifestreams as well. All the major streaming apps like Friendfeed, MyBlogLog, Blogcatalog, etc have Reader Shared Items plugins, so every time you share an item with a click, you're uploading new content to those streams as well. In Friendfeed, your Reader Note even shows up as a comment on the FF item - very cool!
@dimitris You make a good point - Twitter and other services like it can be better for content discovery. Personally, I discover most of my new content through Twitter and Friendfeed.
The argument I was trying to make in this post is not necessarily that Reader is the BEST at all three tasks, but that it could be used effectively to some extent to accomplish all 3 goals in one centralized location. For beginners and people struggling with info overload, this is important.
By the way, I've stopped by your blog and you're doing a great job - I've subscribed, so keep it up!
@mikepk Thank you for your blog post, I mean comment ;) You make some great points, though. I, too sub to a lot of high-volume blogs like Lifehacker and Techcrunch and I know exactly what you mean about seeing the unread number climb steadily.
It used to really bother me, but I eventually realized that it wasn't the end of the world. One way or the other, I am going to miss some content on the web (alas!), so who cares how much content is unread? Items are always arranged chronologically in All Items anyway, so a high number of unread items doesn't affect my continued reading going forward.
Plus, as I mentioned in my recent follow up article on using Reader as a personal search hub, I find it useful to have all the posts from my favourite blogs pulled into Reader, even if I don't get around to reading them, because I want to be able to do a narrow search for certain items within my sphere of trusted sources.
Having said that, I will definitely check Grazr out, it sounds neat. I currently also use Snackr from time to time, an Adobe AIR app that offers up randomized items in a slick news-ticker type interface, a nice complement to GReader.
@Andrew: Check back and let us know how you are liking GR as your hub. I agree that it is pretty darn useful!
@Ken: Thank you for the positive feedback. If you enjoyed this one, be sure to check out my follow up post on using Reader as a personal search hub (I've linked to it above in my reply to Mike.) Thanks also for posting about this on your blog. I stopped by and you've got some excellent content there. I have subscribed, so please keep up the great work!
Unless all I have are "soundbite" level articles, I feel Google Reader is bad at becoming a mind hub.
There are of course many types of hub-like services out there (some even free) but I worry that it can make my post seem spammy.
Instead, I'll try to focus on a service that has been mentioned here.
This isn't Diigo vs. Google Reader.
It's just that Diigo is the most flexible among the services mentioned here. (even better if the bugs are fixed)
Also forgive me if this has been repeated. The Linden blog is open to invited readers only.
Google has the superiority in search but Diigo has the superiority in snippets and skim.
What I mean by this is that even if you're not an annotation kind of person, Diigo separates itself from other highlighters because your highlights get compacted into the actual site.
What this means is that as far as text is concerned, a dedicated highlight is not just a bookmark + highlights. It's actually a manual summarizer and everytime you try to re-read your old bookmarks, it's not a case of returning to that old bookmark and trying to remember why exactly you went there or where exactly is the data you want.
Diigo's home view actually puts the content that interested you originally to the forefront of the bookmark page without even visiting each bookmarks separately or re-reading/force skimming each bookmark. (That is, if you took your time highlighting and annotating the page when you bookmarked it instead of using the highlight feature as a sort of "social bookmarking snippet text preview emphasizer" like I've seen used in many groups.
That said, neither is perfect but I just felt when the word "web brain" is used; content recovery and not memory recovery should be the forefront.
No matter how well Google Reader is, it's still a RSS Reader and saving posts within it to be searched while unique is still bookmarking. Also, this assumes search is so needed that tags or traditional folders can't make up for it. (I'm not saying they are better but the gap is not that huge.)
Diigo on the other handed (while it has many rough edges) gives a preview of what future semantic web applications can really bring. (Some have even called it the first Web 3.0 service.)
That would be a worthier application deserving of a "Web Brain" tag.
I know... I know...
It seems like I'm just attacking GReader in favor of Diigo.
That's kind of the complication with only referring to one service. Especially when dealing with a multiple-use web service like Diigo. (It would be nice to expand all it's flaws by really expanding it's weaknesses compared to other Web Clippers, Mind Mappers, Argument Mappers and Offline Bookmark Managers and Notetakers and To-do lists and programs with online sync.)
That said, the point is not that Diigo is better than GReader or vice versa. It's that the concept of a "Web Brain" still has a long way to go and I hope bloggers don't oversell it because the concept isn't as marketable yet but it needs to. (For example, I can't believe how some people say Diigo was more complicated than Delicious when Delicious' lack of feature made it much harder to grasp why exactly is it does one need to tag their bookmark online.)
In the end, neither this post nor my reply will really influence how future people perceive what a Web Brain is and I'm not on an agenda to search every blog post in the internet that uses the Web Brain adjective (I found this blog via Copyblogger) but I'd like to at least share an opinion that hopes to tone down these well known bookmarking/lifestreaming/Google products and alert people to the fact that there are many other applications that are rough around the edges but seeks to fulfill the "Brain" mantra that needs some loving and let's not give the more well known applications some more added PR they do not need. (Again, apologize if this sounds spammy because there's a product out there that's actually called the Brain. This isn't actually an advertisement of that product but I omitted "Web" Brain because there are many products offline that can serve as a Brain but part of their flaws are that they are not an online service.)
Really, I'm not trying to be all doom and gloom but just look at the online RSS Reader industry and how unneeded hype for Google Reader killed many quality online alternatives and even FeedDemon moved to Google Reader sync. (Although I'm not saying it's Google's fault entirely. Newshutch for example was an underrated abandoned RSS service that had other issues but it's also pretty damning when a developer abandons their project because "They lost the hunger". Even while it was gaining popularity, Newshutch was rarely listed among the ranks of Rojo, Bloglines, GReader and even Netvibes and IGoogle.)